Bypass SQLite exclusive lock šŸ”

ā€œError: database is lockedā€ is not an acceptable answer

October 14, 2021

Thereā€™s a number of ways SQLite can lock a database file, and if youā€™re encountering a ā€œdatabase is lockedā€ error, according to the internet, you have two options:

  1. If you control the software that created the lock, go and fix the problematic queries.
  2. Youā€™re fucked.

By ā€œyouā€™re fuckedā€ I mean that your seemingly only option is to copy the whole database file and query the copy. If working off a one-time snapshot of the database work for you, awesome, problem solved:

$ echo .tables | sqlite3 db.sqlite
Error: database is locked
$ cp db.sqlite db-snapshot.sqlite
$ echo '.tables' | sqlite3 db-snapshot.sqlite
actual_table

But it seems thatā€™s not a good enough solution for many people (including myself) and weā€™re desperately trying to perform read-only queries on a locked SQLite database.

This is especially useful for Firefox and Chrome SQLite files because both browsers have a bad tendency to keep them permanently locked, preventing us to access the database without closing the browser first.

In my case, I want to poll a specific table, and while technically the database is small enough that itā€™s not a problem to copy it over and over to query it periodically, I just donā€™t like this idea and I believe there must be a better way.

So let me tell you the better way.

The better way

SQLite allows passing a file: URI instead of a filename (e.g. file:db.sqlite instead of db.sqlite), which comes with the extra ability to pass query string parameters.

Some of those are aliases for flags you could otherwise set when opening the connexion, for example mode=ro is equivalent to setting SQLITE_OPEN_READONLY and cache=private the same as SQLITE_OPEN_PRIVATECACHE.

But we also have other parameters that have a deeper implementation that would otherwise be inaccessible to the SQLite user (no configuration flags for those). In particular, nolock and immutable.

While nolock only prevents this connection from locking the database and doesnā€™t do anything about the fact a lock is already being held by another connection, the immutable is especially interesting for us. From its documentation:

The immutable parameter is a boolean query parameter that indicates that the database file is stored on read-only media. When immutable is set, SQLite assumes that the database file cannot be changed, and so the database is opened read-only and all locking and change detection is disabled.

Caution: setting the immutable property on a database file that does in fact change can result in incorrect query results and/or SQLITE_CORRUPT errors.

See also: SQLITE_IOCAP_IMMUTABLE.

Even though SQLITE_IOCAP_IMMUTABLE is not an option per se, but a particular characteristic of the IO device, we can force SQLite to treat the database as if was on an read-only device by setting immutable=1, which has the particularity of disabling all locking mechanisms, including that of respecting existing locks.

With this trick, we can rewrite the previous fix:

$ echo .tables | sqlite3 db.sqlite
Error: database is locked
$ echo '.tables' | sqlite3 'file:db.sqlite?immutable=1'
actual_table

This doesnā€™t require creating a copy of the file that you want to query despite it being locked by another active connection!

The only caveat is because SQLite doesnā€™t expect that file to be updated, changes wont be reflected in that immutable connexion, so itā€™s still like youā€™re querying a snapshot, itā€™s just that you donā€™t have to physically copy the database in order to read it.

Also as mentioned earlier, if the underlying database is updated, this might result in errors when querying over the immutable connection. Because of that, I would recommending opening a new connection every time you want to query the database.

Applying it to a SQLite driver

Itā€™s nice to be able to do that with the CLI, but how do we do that from a program that uses a SQLite driver? In my case Iā€™m using sqlite3 with Node.js, but the method should be very similar in your language of choice.

Because the immutable option is only available in the URI filename format, we need to pass this kind of URI to our driver, e.g. file:db.sqlite?immutable=1 as opposed to db.sqlite.

The URI format is not enabled by default and you need to pass the SQLITE_OPEN_URI flag in order to enable it.

With sqlite3, this looks like this:

const sqlite3 = require('sqlite3')
const db = new sqlite3.Database('file:db.sqlite?immutable=1', sqlite3.OPEN_READONLY | sqlite3.OPEN_URI)

We need to precise OPEN_READONLY because OPEN_URI alone is not a valid mode, and by passing an explicit mode, weā€™re effectively overriding the default of SQLITE_OPEN_READWRITE | SQLITE_OPEN_CREATE | SQLITE_OPEN_FULLMUTEX.

Wrapping up

I hope you enjoyed this trick! If you find a better way to do this, or a way that allows to reflect underlying database updates without reloading the connection, please let me know, Iā€™d love to know about it!

And as usual, keep hacking. šŸ˜œ

Want to leave a comment?

Join the discussion on Twitter or send me an email! šŸ’Œ
This post helped you? Buy me a coffee! šŸ»